EN|中文
The Long View  ·  from the Rental Desk of Harvey W James

Why You Bought London

for the day you think of selling
What fell. What recovered. What endures.
A standing page · revised when the data revises · not advice — memory, with receipts
Our Interest, Declared
Read this first

We are a letting agent. If you hold, we earn; if you sell, we don’t. Weigh everything on this page with that in mind. We would rather you leave with the whole picture than stay on half of one — and some of you should sell. When that’s true of you, we’ll say it to your face. What follows is data and context, not a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any investment.

Harvey W James
The Squeeze — every word of it conceded
The income has been squeezed. We won’t pretend otherwise.

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025

Section 21 abolished, rental bidding banned, Section 13 the only route to raise rent. Less flexibility, more process. Real.

Tax that no longer flatters

Section 24 restricting mortgage-interest relief, and a raised Stamp Duty surcharge on additional homes. The maths is tighter than it was.

The overseas cost stack

The Non-Resident Landlord scheme, currency exposure, cross-border accountancy. For an NRL, the frictions add up.

The running costs

Letting fees, management, compliance certificates, refurbishment between tenancies. None of it is free, and we won’t say it is.

If you bought a London flat for the monthly income, this climate is genuinely hard, and no chart changes that. But that was rarely the reason. Here is what the reason actually was.

The Scar Chart — fifty years, falls and all
1989–9620082016–now £200k£400k£600k 197519851995200520152025 £540,903 LONDON HOUSE PRICES, 1973–2026 · falls shaded Nominal (price of the day) Real (in today’s money)
“We shaded the falls darker than the rises. If a page like this hides the crashes, don’t trust the rest of it.”   The argument isn’t that the line never fell — it’s where it ended despite the shaded years. Nominal: Nationwide HPI (Greater London, all properties). Real: deflated by ONS RPI to 2026 money.
−45%
Real-terms fall from the 1989 peak — and over a decade to recover it (not until ~2000). Nominal fell 31%. Nationwide + ONS RPI
−25%
Real-terms change over the last decade (2016–now). London has lost ground in today’s money. Nationwide + ONS RPI
38×
Nominal growth since 1975 (£14,351 → £540,903). The long arc, scars included. Nationwide HPI

Read the black line and London looks like a rocket. Read the brown line — the same prices in today’s money — and you see the truth: London has fallen hard, more than once, and made investors wait more than a decade to get back to level. It is a decades asset, not a years one. London asks a patience most assets don’t — better to know now whether you have it than to find out in the middle of a downturn.

What You Actually Bought — the capital case
Capital · why hold

A store of wealth you can stand inside.

The spine of it: you’re feeling a yield problem and calling it a capital problem — and they are not the same thing. London residential was never a high-income asset. It is a low-yield, high-security, long-hold store of value: rule of law, a stable currency, an asset the whole world recognises and few can take from you. For an overseas owner, that safety was usually the whole reason — and none of this year’s headlines has touched it.

The Scar Chart earns this the honest way: across fifty years, through two brutal real-terms drawdowns, the patient holder still ended far ahead. Not because London can’t fall — it plainly can — but because the reasons people want to own here have outlasted every downturn so far. Past is not a promise. It is a record.

The City That Refills — the demand case
Demand · why there’s always a tenant

London keeps pulling people in.

Not a “better class of tenant” — we don’t grade people, and the law rightly forbids it. Something steadier: London draws the world for work, study, medicine, culture, so there is always someone who needs a well-run home here. That depth of demand is what protects your asset — lower long-run voids, steadier tenancies — not the type of person inside it.

And the demand runs into a wall of supply. That gap is the engine under both the rent you collect and the price you hold.

221,070
Net new homes in England, 2023–24 — against a 300,000 target. MHCLG
~33,000
Homes delivered in London vs a 52,000 need — the draft plan raises it to 88,000. London Plan / GLA
9.7 billion
World population by 2050, from 8.1 billion today. The UK’s 69.5 million keeps forming households faster than we build. UN WPP 2024 · ONS

Price it right — which is the whole of our day-one thesis — and the city keeps refilling the pool, so it lets. We don’t chase a headline rent; we don’t need to. Depth does the work.

The Decade Strip — and the cell we refuse to fill
1975
£14,351
pre-1987
1985
£54,428
pre-1987
1995
£74,161
real £201,929
2005
£241,897
real £510,395
2015
£456,229
real £717,156
2025
£529,372
real £531,322
2050
no price forecast — drivers only

The empty chip is the point. We will chart the drivers to 2050 — population, households, the build gap — and leave the price cell blank, permanently. Anyone who fills it is guessing. Notice, too, what the real column shows: 2015’s £456k was worth £717k in today’s money, and today’s London sits below that. The last ten years were not a boom. We’d rather you saw that here than discovered it after.

When Selling Is Right — we keep this section, always

Sometimes the honest answer is: sell.

  • The capital has a better job to do — a business, a pension, a need the equity serves more than a London flat does.
  • The squeeze is genuinely breaking your plan — the cashflow no longer works and holding is hope, not strategy.
  • Life has moved — you’re consolidating, retiring abroad, simplifying. A portfolio should fit the life, not the other way round.
  • You can’t hold through a lost decade — and this asset, on its own record, sometimes asks exactly that.
“If holding has become sentiment rather than strategy, tell us — we’ll tell you straight, even though we’d rather keep managing it for you.”
For the Record — sources, method, how to cite

Sources & method

  • House prices: Nationwide House Price Index — Greater London, all properties, quarterly from 1973.
  • Real terms: Nationwide nominal deflated by the ONS Retail Prices Index (RPI, CHAW) to Q2 2026 money. Real series shown from 1987, where RPI is on the same basis; earlier years shown nominal.
  • Housing supply: MHCLG net additional dwellings (England); the London Plan / GLA housing targets and delivery.
  • Population: ONS (UK) and the UN World Population Prospects 2024 (world).
  • We report these figures and add our reading. We compute no index of our own, and we forecast no price.

Cite this page

For landlords, analysts and students:

Harvey W James (2026) Why You Bought London — The Long View. Analysis of Nationwide HPI and ONS RPI (to Q2 2026). harveywjames.com/why-you-bought-london

A standing page, revised only when the data revises — each revision logged.

Not financial advice. This page is information and context, not a personal recommendation to buy, hold or sell any property or investment, and Harvey W James is not a regulated financial adviser. Property values fall as well as rise — this page shows exactly that. Speak to a suitably qualified, regulated adviser about your own position before you decide anything.
Harvey W James
Written to be read on the day you think of selling — and to still be true